first commit

This commit is contained in:
strepsiades
2026-03-09 16:31:42 +08:00
commit 4a9c444b10
486 changed files with 52479 additions and 0 deletions
+252
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,252 @@
# DataSource Layer Implementation
## Overview
This document describes the new datasource layer for `sync_system_new`, which is completely decoupled from the sync strategy and state machine logic.
## Architecture
The datasource layer follows a pure execution model:
1. **Load**: Reads data from backend and creates `SyncNode` instances
2. **Save**: Executes actions (CREATE/UPDATE/DELETE) based on `node.action`
3. **Update Status**: Sets `node.status` to SUCCESS or FAILED after execution
### Key Principles
- **No Strategy Logic**: Datasource doesn't make decisions about what to sync
- **State-Driven**: Only reads `node.action` and `node.status` to determine behavior
- **No ID Resolution**: IDs are already resolved by the strategy layer
- **Backend Agnostic**: Abstract base class supports multiple backends
## Components
### 1. Base Protocol (`base.py`)
#### `DataSourceProtocol`
Protocol defining the interface for all datasource implementations:
```python
async def load_nodes(
node_type: str,
collection: DataCollection,
**filters: Any
) -> None:
"""Load data from backend and create SyncNodes"""
async def save_nodes(
node_type: str,
collection: DataCollection
) -> None:
"""Execute pending actions for nodes"""
```
#### `BaseDataSource`
Abstract base class providing common functionality:
- `load_nodes`: Creates SyncNodes from raw data
- `save_nodes`: Executes actions and updates status
- `_handle_create/update/delete`: Action-specific handlers
Subclasses implement:
- `_load_raw_data`: Load from backend
- `_create_item`: Execute CREATE
- `_update_item`: Execute UPDATE
- `_delete_item`: Execute DELETE
- `_generate_id`: Generate new IDs
### 2. JSONL Implementation (`jsonl_datasource.py`)
#### `JsonlDataSource`
JSONL-based datasource for local testing:
**Features:**
- Loads `.jsonl` files into memory
- Generates UUIDs for new items
- Supports filtering during load
- Supports read-only mode
- Persists changes back to files
**File Structure:**
```
data/
├── contract_1.jsonl
├── project_1.jsonl
└── ...
```
**Usage:**
```python
datasource = JsonlDataSource(Path("data/"))
# Load nodes
await datasource.load_nodes("contract", collection, project_id="P1")
# Execute actions
await datasource.save_nodes("contract", collection)
# Persist to disk
await datasource.save_all()
```
### 3. Domain Handlers
Domain-specific handlers provide business logic (optional):
**Example: `domain/contract/jsonl_handler.py`**
```python
class ContractJsonlHandler:
@staticmethod
def validate_create(data: Any) -> None:
"""Validate before create"""
@staticmethod
def transform_for_create(data: Any) -> Dict[str, Any]:
"""Transform data before create"""
```
## Node Lifecycle
### Loading Phase
1. Datasource reads raw data from backend
2. Creates `SyncNode` for each item:
- `node_id`: Unique session ID (e.g., "contract_C1")
- `data_id`: Backend ID (e.g., "C1")
- `origin_data`: Raw data from backend
- `data`: Copy of origin_data (may be modified by strategy)
- `action`: NONE (initial)
- `status`: PENDING (initial)
### Execution Phase
For each node with `status == PENDING` and `action != NONE`:
1. **CREATE**:
- Generate new ID via `_generate_id`
- Call `_create_item` with new ID and data
- Set `node.data_id` to new ID
- Set `node.status` to SUCCESS
2. **UPDATE**:
- Call `_update_item` with existing `data_id` and data
- Set `node.status` to SUCCESS
3. **DELETE**:
- Call `_delete_item` with `data_id`
- Set `node.status` to SUCCESS
4. **Error Handling**:
- On exception: Set `node.status` to FAILED
- Set `node.error` to exception message
## Integration with Sync System
The datasource is used by the pipeline layer:
```python
# 1. Load data
local_ds = JsonlDataSource(Path("local_data/"))
remote_ds = JsonlDataSource(Path("remote_data/"))
local_collection = DataCollection("local")
remote_collection = DataCollection("remote")
await local_ds.load_nodes("contract", local_collection)
await remote_ds.load_nodes("contract", remote_collection)
# 2. Strategy layer determines actions
strategy = ContractSyncStrategy(...)
await strategy.bind(...) # Sets node.action
# 3. Execute actions
await remote_ds.save_nodes("contract", remote_collection)
await remote_ds.save_all()
```
## Testing
Comprehensive test suite in `tests/test_datasource.py`:
- Basic loading and node creation
- Filtering during load
- CREATE/UPDATE/DELETE actions
- Error handling and status updates
- Read-only mode
- Multiple node types
Run tests:
```bash
python -m pytest sync_system_new/tests/test_datasource.py -v
```
## Future Extensions
### API DataSource
For production use, implement `ApiDataSource`:
```python
class ApiDataSource(BaseDataSource):
async def _load_raw_data(self, node_type: str, **filters):
# Call REST API
async def _create_item(self, node_type: str, item_id: str, data):
# POST request
async def _generate_id(self, node_type: str, data):
# Return None - server generates ID
```
### Database DataSource
For SQL databases:
```python
class DatabaseDataSource(BaseDataSource):
async def _load_raw_data(self, node_type: str, **filters):
# SELECT query
async def _create_item(self, node_type: str, item_id: str, data):
# INSERT query
```
## Comparison with Legacy System
### Legacy System (`sync_system/datasource/`)
- Tightly coupled with RepositoryProtocol
- Mixed concerns (data access + business logic)
- Schema validation in datasource layer
- Different interface for each entity type
### New System (`sync_system_new/datasource/`)
- Decoupled from strategy and state machine
- Pure data access (business logic in domain handlers)
- Generic interface for all entity types
- Direct integration with SyncNode and DataCollection
## Key Differences
| Aspect | Legacy | New |
|--------|--------|-----|
| Coupling | Tight with sync policies | Decoupled from sync logic |
| Interface | Repository per entity | Generic load/save |
| ID Handling | Mixed responsibilities | IDs already resolved |
| State Management | Mixed with data access | SyncNode-based |
| Testing | Complex setup | Simple, focused tests |
## Conclusion
The new datasource layer provides:
1. **Clear Separation**: Data access is isolated from sync logic
2. **Flexibility**: Easy to add new backend types
3. **Testability**: Simple, focused tests
4. **Type Safety**: Full integration with Pydantic models
5. **Maintainability**: Single responsibility per component